Major Improvements for Trampolining Competitions in 2008/2009
download this document

2008 will be a big year for competitive trampolining in the UK. Today’s
competition structure, which was introduced in a huge change during
1993/94 to solve problems of the late 1980s, will be replaced by a new
scheme designed for the 21st century.
For the transition, coaches and performers will be given freedom and
responsibility to choose their appropriate starting point in the new
system, within guidelines.
This means coaches will be able to choose the right level in the system
for their performer’s development. Over the course of the transition
year, people who have started in the wrong level will gradually be moved
into the correct level, and the final group sizes gradually achieved.
What Exactly Will Be Changing?
In October 2008, the existing eight Grades will be replaced along with
the current matrix of 23 routines, and 45 different qualification and
relegation marks for different age groups.
In their place will be nine standard levels, leading from beginner to
international. Performers will progress through them at their own pace,
regardless of age.
The scheme is designed around the career of the modern trampolinist.
Today’s future world champions are unlikely to hit their peak for twenty
years, and their career may last thirty years.
Tomorrow’s champion and tomorrow’s
enthusiastic participant will begin with the same developmental stages,
although the champion may progress more quickly and further. Our future
champion, aged six today, has twenty years of development ahead of them
to reach their peak in their mid twenties, and up to another fifteen
years to retirement.
Elite and recreational performers lose out when
they are encouraged to miss out or rush key stages in their development
in pursuit of early competitive titles. The competition structure is built around the LTAD
(Long Term Athlete Development) stages. To find out more about LTAD,
download the “LTAD Gymnastics Leaflet” from the BG website and refer to
the new club coach manual (in press). Trampoline is shortly to release
its own adapted version of this model. Each of these stages has its own distinctive
flavour. FIG A is provided for our top athletes, and will
provide an authentic experience of pressure and practice to prepare for
world events during the top stages of the Training to Win stage.
This level will follow FIG (Federation of International Gymnastics)
rules and regulations. FIG B, National C and Home
Nation/Regional D will provide gradual development with some
pressure and gradual progression: performers move from level to level as
their ranking changes.
The
lower stages provide gradual progression, guided by requirements
that will allow all performers around the country to enjoy the
development pathways that have proven most successful in recent years.
Focus is on technique and skill development, with a traditional
competition format retained to allow everyone the opportunity to
experience competition. As at present, clubs will have the option to
operate the first levels within the club.
Where Will I Start?
This all depends where you finish 2008.
Grade 1 performers are likely to compete in either: FIG A, FIG B, or
National C.
Grade 2 performers are likely to compete in either: National C or Home
Nation/Regional D.
Grade 3 performers are likely to compete in either: Home Nation/Regional
D, Regional E or Regional F.
Coaches and Performers will choose the level at which to start the new
season, based on the Grade in which they finish the 2008 season (after
any qualification or downgrade achieved during the season).
To help us plan numbers, you and your coach must tell us which level you
intend to start at no later than September 2008.
Coaches should think in terms of the new philosophy that replaces
age-banded ‘Grades’ with gradual introduction to pressure, in line with
each performer’s developmental stage. Most younger competitors will be
best starting in the earlier levels, allowing scope for promotion as
they develop.
Performers who enter at the wrong level will be gradually redistributed
during the season by the rolling promotion and relegations.
| Grade after 2008 | Suggested Start Point: |
| Men/Ladies Grade 1 (over 13) Grade 1 (under 13) Grade 2 (over 11) Grade 2 (under 11) Grade 3 All other competitors |
FIG A or FIG B FIG B, National C or Home Nation/Regional D National C or Home Nation/Regional D National C, Home Nation/Regional D or Regional E Home Nation/Regional D or Regional E Home Nation/Regional D, Regional E or Regional F Regional F, Regional G, Club H or Club I. |

All competitions will take place during a season from late winter to early summer. They will alternate around every three weeks between regional events and national events (although the transition year may look slightly different).
FIG A, FIG B and National C will take place together at spectacular gala events, bringing all levels together and allowing performers at early developmental stages to learn from more advanced competitors, and to get a feel for the next level before trialling at it.
These gala weekends will, wherever possible, include both DMT (Double Mini Trampolining) and Synchronised Trampolining. Details on these events will be released later.
A New Logbook to Help Performers Develop
It is our intention to produce a logbook that will be introduced to guide coaches and performers through the skills and practices they may use to prepare at each level.
It has been distilled from successful practice around the country, and it may also provide useful guidance if you are unsure what level to start a performer in October 2008.
Once published it will be made available for download from www.bg-coaches.org together with other resources (e.g. video) to help both coaches and competitors prepare.
So What Does it all Mean?
Soon we will all begin to see a new view of how a competitive trampolinist can develop, over their whole career.
Performers will travel a smooth path from beginner to Olympian, on a route guided through each stage of development. Each individual will advance from stage to stage at the time they are ready.
Questions
Detail is being made available at http://www.bg-coaches.org and summarised in GymNews. We will be able to answer questions online as we approach the transition date.
Training to Win and Training to Compete: Promotion and Relegation Between Levels
The old promotion and relegation system between levels based on achieving a single arbitrary score at a single competition during the season will no longer be used at Training to Win or Training to Compete levels.
Instead, performers will earn and lose points during the season, based on their performance relative to others in their level. Gaining enough points will earn the right to a trial at the next level, while losing enough points will lead to a trial at the previous level.
At the end of each competition, the performer’s scores will be listed on the bg-coaches.org website in rank order. A proportion of the highest ranked performers (the promotion zone) in each level will each receive one point. A proportion of the lowest ranked performers (the relegation zone) will each lose one point. Men and women will be ranked separately.
Reaching plus two points will give the right to trial at the next level (e.g. FIG B). In the trial you enter a competition at the next level: finish outside the relegation zone to be promoted to FIG B, starting on zero points at the next event. Finishing in the relegation zone means you return to National C at the next event.
Reaching minus two points leads to a trial at the previous level (e.g. Home Nation/Regional D). In the trial you enter a competition at the previous level: finish in the promotion zone to return to National C. If you finish the trial outside the promotion zone, you join Home Nation/Regional D, starting on zero points.
Your points and level can only change when competing, and are carried over between seasons without any penalties. Qualification for National Finals is also shown on the website after each event, and can be achieved based on meeting the required ranking at any event in the year.
Technicalities will be covered in the relevant Competition Structure Handbook. The new system is much easier to use than to write down on paper, and will quickly become second nature to coaches, performers and parents. Not only does it eliminate the effects of variations in judging between events and regions, it is also much easier to explain to outsiders than the existing complicated matrix of requirements.
What Happened to All the Other Proposals We Saw in January 2007?
The existing competition structure was designed to address problems of the late 1980s; the sport has moved on since then. The competition structure has always had a huge impact on the activities and planning of all competitive clubs in the UK.
This change is designed to bring the structure into the 21st century, giving clubs the ability to provide modern training and development that has been demonstrated to work in the long run.
Not everything you saw at the technical conference could be achieved for October 2008. Such a major shift in philosophy must be achieved hand in hand with trampolining’s specialist teams, such as judging and coach education, and allow time to prepare. Progress on some key proposals will depend on their expert input over the coming months and years.
How Do You Plan For A Change As Big As This?
Proposals for major improvements to the UK competition scheme were first presented to trampolinists for consultation at the Technical Conference in January 2007. There was strong support for the proposal, along with concerns about the detail of the judging proposals. As well as the trampolinists present, there was support from coaches in other disciplines, including one memorable comment, ‘This is just what tumbling needs!’
Since then, there has been extensive work behind-the-scenes, culminating in a full submission to NTTC in April 2007. On Sunday 27 May, Wayne Smith (Chair of Competitions Committee) presented the proposal to the NTTC meeting.
NTTC made further improvements to the submission prior to approving it for implementation in October 2008.
Why the Big Change?
The existing system has been used for 14 years, while competitor numbers have increased, and substantial youth international success has occurred.
The system needs change because:
It Ignores LTAD. Trampolinists enter at all ages, but the system of routines and qualifying marks has meant the young can quickly be exposed to the national competition circuit and pressure with limited preparation and while still in their learning to train stage.
Fixture Congestion. The number of weekends used by competitions has had an impact on other beneficial activities in trampolining, like regional and squad activities, club training, friendly competitions and synchro. It also impacts on family life for coaches and family, school and social lives of competitors.
Big Pressure on Small Athletes. Exposure to pressure is needed to develop mental toughness. However, the current scheme means younger performers face this pressure early in their career, while still in the learning to train stage. Events such as transition between age groups (with changes in qualifying marks, routines and judging) can have a major impact, yet are based entirely on chronological age.
The early introduction to ‘high’ grades for younger competitors can be followed by years of fighting to avoid downgrading at the end of each year as the requirements become more onerous. The separation of Grade 1 events from Grade 2 events from regional events means downgrading has a major impact on performers’ social lives and self-image as well as their trampolining.
Youth Success, Senior Drop-Outs
The UK’s elite youth compete for National Champion Titles from age nine; exposure of young athletes to intense competitive pressure has led to major successes in the Youth International team, but has also seen many young stars drop out as they find this early success become more difficult to repeat.
As explained by David Ross at the 2006 Technical Conference, many countries enjoying sustained senior international success today do not emphasise developing competition form until a performer’s late teens. Many successful countries use competition systems which make no attempt to accelerate younger performers’ entry to national competition at all.
Interestingly, Britain has a proud tradition of senior international success. Nearly all of these successes were achieved by performers who started on the ‘Open’ circuit, where no distinction was made for age at all.
Emphasis on FIG Competitive Form at all Stages of Development
The existing competition scheme makes development dependent on competition marks, which depend on development of FIG-defined competitive form. It is not just other countries that avoid this emphasis in the early years of a trampolinist’s career: our own National Technical Priorities, developed by the National Squad Performance Directors seek a return to fundamentals of jumping skills over form, until they are thoroughly ingrained. In particular, the emphasis on kick-outs and remaining straight into the bed is considered to be unhelpful.
After a competition, performers receive only a generalised, overall subjective mark to chart their progress. China and other countries provide specific, objective feedback measures such as routine time instead of, or as well as, the overall subjective mark.
Competitive Season Only Provided for Grade One Competitors
The scheme provides an off-season for grade one competitors only. All other competitors are expected to prepare for competitions throughout the year, with no variation for holiday, skill development, strength development, etc.
Natural Judging Variation Affects Performer Development
The reliance on absolute qualifying marks expects judges to be as uniform as robots! In reality, qualification rates vary substantially between regions and also between events in the national circuit.
|
National Routines as of October 2008 |
|
| FIG A World FIG A routine (see FIG website for more information) Minimum age 15 in year of competition. |
FIG B World FIG B routine (See FIG website for more information) |
| National C 10 different skills including: • 9 somersaults of at least 270o rotation, TO INCLUDE • A skill with a min of 270º rotation landing on either the front or back and from this skill, a skill with a min of 450o rotation, AND: • A back somersault with 360º turn (Full), OR • A front somersault with 540º turn (Rudolf), OR • A skill of 720º somersault. |
Home Nation/Regional D 10 different skills including: • 7 skills with a min of 270o rotation, TO INCLUDE • 1 skill with a min of 360º of somersault and 360º of twist, OR • 1 skill landing with a min of 270º rotation landing on either the front or back and from this skill, 1 skill with a min of 450º of rotation. |
|
Regional Routines as of October 2008 To Be Confirmed |
|